In short…
Dear White House, thank you for turning over the documents regarding the highly controversial attorney firings. Just one question. Why is there an 18 day gap in the documentation starting with the President’s and Karl Rove’s comments and input on the matter?
As much as I’m a proponent of alternative fuels and innovative solutions, putting a hydrogen burning engine on everything from your car to your blender is NOT a solution. Hydrogen is currently requires quite a bit of energy to create. Need to solve that problem further upstream imho before declaring it a silver bullet.
You still look like a dork with your bluetooth headset. Sorry, just calling it like I see it.
I just love the incredibly creative architecture in these cutting edge “eco-homes” and off-grid constructions. No really, I’d love to own one. However, do you really think 500k+ houses will be adopted on a large enough scale to actually make a significant impact?
While I admire the engineering involved and I’m sure the view is stunning, putting a sky bridge on the Grand Canyon seems to me like offering “pony rides” on sedated Great White Sharks. Sort of takes the natural splendor out of it.
I’m curious, where is the controversy in the firings? I’ve not had time to look anything up and have only heard blurbs about on the “top of the hour” news reports.
– Obstruction of Justice
– Falsifying Evidence
– Lying to Congress
And the way things are progressing, it wouldn’t surprise me if he (Gonzales) added destroying evidence to the list.
So… is Congress planning to press charges, hold hearings and become the judicial branch of the government now as well as the legislative?
IE – Why are they all up in this, shouldn’t they let the Attorney General handle it? How does this have to do with the creation/adoption of laws?